ArticleStroke and vascular neurology2025
Long-term outcome in a cohort of 36 patients with sacral dural arteriovenous fistulae after endovascular embolisation or microsurgery.
Article in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSacral dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) is a rare spinal vascular malformation and often misdiagnosed or even mistreated. This study delved into the clinical characteristics, vascular architecture and treatment results of SDAVF, with the goal of enhancing upcoming diagnostic and therapeutic methodologies.
methodsFrom March 2014 to March 2022, consecutive patients with SDAVF were retrospectively analysed. The data on demographics, symptom resolution, angioarchitectural features and postoperative course were studied. Spinal cord function was evaluated by modified Aminoff-Logue scale.
resultsA total of 36 patients with 36 SDAVFs were enrolled, 12 of whom were misdiagnosed on their initial visit. The SDAVFs were located at S1 in 24 (66.7%), S2 in 10 (27.8%) and S3 in 2 (5.6%) cases, respectively. The primary feeding arteries included lateral sacral artery (LSA) of internal iliac artery (31/36, 86.1%), the branches of external iliac artery (2/36, 5.6%) and median artery (3/36, 8.3%), most of which are straight. Venae terminalisis is the sole drainage vein, flowing back into perimedullary venous network. Endovascular embolisation is the main therapy method for 30 cases, while the other 6 cases were treated with microsurgical fistulectomy. MRI tests showed that the abnormal vascular signals around the medulla disappeared, and the spinal cord oedema was alleviated in the majority of cases (32/36, 88.9%). Six patients, who all were treated by endovascular embolisation at first time, had residual or recurrent and two of them were performed by microsurgical fistulectomy again. All patients by microsurgical fistulectomy had no residual or recurrent during follow-up. According to the spinal cord functional assessment, the Aminoff-Logue score was significantly decreased (Z=-3.449, p=0.001) postoperatively.
conclusionThe misdiagnosis rate of SDAVF is very high. The most feeding artery of SDAVF came from the LSA, which was thicker and more straight, making it easier for microcatheters to reach the fistula site. So, endovascular embolism has become the first choice of treatment with minimal invasion, and safe and effective results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.