Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39947710›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open ophthalmology2025

Impact of the restrictive technique on outcomes in Baerveldt-350 implant surgery.

Gloria Segura-Duch, David Oliver-Gutierrez, Susana Duch, Mar Schilt, Carlos Arciniegas-Perasso

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gloria Segura-DuchOphthalmology, Verte-ICO Oftalmología, Barcelona, Spain.
David Oliver-GutierrezOphthalmology, Verte-ICO Oftalmología, Barcelona, Spain.
Susana DuchOphthalmology, Verte-ICO Oftalmología, Barcelona, Spain sdt123654@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5965-8315
Mar SchiltOphthalmology, Verte-ICO Oftalmología, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Arciniegas-PerassoOphthalmology, Verte-ICO Oftalmología, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent aqueous restrictive manoeuvres in non-valved devices affect intraocular pressure (IOP) levels in the first postoperative month. This study compares tube ligature (TL) alone to TL plus rip cord stent (TLS) on the efficacy of the Baerveldt 350.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective consecutive case-series observational study to assess efficacy by measuring IOP, success rates and the reduction of antiglaucoma medication usage over 3 years.

resultsThe study included 43 eyes in the TL group and 29 in the TLS group. Initial IOPs were 26.67 mm Hg for TL and 28.21 mm Hg for TLS. After 1 year, IOP decreased to 13.03 mm Hg and 12.11 mm Hg, respectively. Over 3 years, TLS consistently achieved greater reductions in IOP compared with TL, with significant differences of 3.56 mm Hg in the second year (p=0.01) and 3.34 mm Hg in the third year (p=0.01). Mean antiglaucoma medication use decreased from 3.03 (SD 1.29) to 0.72 (SD 0.47) over 3 years, representing a 76.24% reduction, with no differences between the TL and TLS groups. Failure rate at 1 year was significantly lower for TLS under the success criteria of IOP=(6-18) mm Hg (TL: 33.33%, TLS: 7.14%, p=0.02). Rates of transient hypotension and hypertensive phase were higher in the TL group: 93.02% vs 34.48% (p<0.001) and 58.14% vs 32.14% (χ²=4.59, p=0.03), respectively.

conclusionAdding the rip cord stent to the Baerveldt implant significantly enhances long-term IOP control and reduces failure rates compared with TL alone. The lower incidence of hypertensive phases could be due to sequential tube opening. Small sample size, lack of randomisation and follow-up discrepancies may introduce bias and limit statistical power, highlighting the need for further research to confirm these conclusions.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsIntraocular PressureStentsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLigationMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTonometry, OcularTreatment OutcomeAqueous humourGlaucomaIntraocular pressureTreatment SurgeryWound healing

Identifiers

PMID39947710
PMCPMC11831295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.