ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Leveraging Physics-Based Synthetic MR Images and Deep Transfer Learning for Artifact Reduction in Echo-Planar Imaging.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based prostate cancer diagnosis on MRI with hip prostheses: artifact and sequence effects.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Super-resolution sodium MRI of human gliomas at 3T using physics-based generative artificial intelligence.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgound and purposeThis study utilizes a physics-based approach to synthesize realistic MR artifacts and train a deep learning generative adversarial network (GAN) for use in artifact reduction on EPI, a crucial neuroimaging sequence with high acceleration that is notoriously susceptible to artifacts. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 4,573 anatomical MR sequences from 1,392 patients undergoing clinically indicated MRI of the brain were used to create a synthetic data set using physics-based, simulated artifacts commonly found in EPI. By using multiple MRI contrasts, we hypothesized the GAN would learn to correct common artifacts while preserving the inherent contrast information, even for contrasts the network has not been trained on. A modified
resultsThe "stacked transfer learning" approach had superior artifact reduction performance compared to the other approaches as measured by Mean Squared Error (MSE = 0.0016), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM = 0.92), multiscale SSIM (MS-SSIM = 0.92), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR = 28.10), and Hausdorff distance (HAUS = 4.08mm), suggesting that leveraging pre-trained knowledge and sequentially training on each artifact is the best approach this application. In recurrent glioblastoma, significantly higher visual quality was observed in model predicted images compared to native images, while quantitative measurements within the tumor regions remained consistent with non-corrected images.
conclusionsThe current study demonstrates the feasibility of using a physics-based method for synthesizing a large data set of images with realistic artifacts and the effectiveness of utilizing this synthetic data set in a "stacked transfer learning" approach to training a GAN for reduction of EPI-based artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.