Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39947674›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology and biotechnology2024

Narjes J Alamer, Munirah F Aldayel, Ashraf Khalifa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Narjes J AlamerBiological Science Department, College of Science, King Faisal University; P.O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Munirah F AldayelBiological Science Department, College of Science, King Faisal University; P.O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Ashraf KhalifaBiological Science Department, College of Science, King Faisal University; P.O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the dangerous effects on the environment of commonly used packaging materials like low-density polyethylene (LDPE), finding a practical and environmentally safe method for decomposing plastics is crucial. In this study, a bacterial strain (HMBC3) was identified in plastic-contaminated soil samples from eastern Saudi Arabia and showed potential for breaking down LDPE, as revealed by results from weight loss, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). HMBC3 was discovered among bacterial isolates in a mineral nutritional medium (MNM) enhanced with LDPE as the only carbon and energy source. The strain caused changes in the media pH from 7.0 ± 0.03 to 6.23 ± 0.05, while the LDPE also showed 20.4% weight loss. In addition, the 16S rRNA gene similarities revealed a 98.9% homology between HMBC3 and

Indexed as

BacillaceaePolyethyleneSoil MicrobiologyBiodegradation, EnvironmentalDNA, BacterialGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSaudi ArabiaSoilSoil PollutantsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredDNA, BacterialPolyethyleneRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil PollutantsBiodegradationCytobacillusplasticpollutionSaudi Arabiasoil

Identifiers

PMID39947674
PMCPMC11876017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.