Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39947395›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2025

State Laws Leveraging the Community Eligibility Provision to Build Healthy School Meals for All: A Content Analysis.

Elizabeth Piekarz-Porter, Juliana Cohen, Rebecca M Schermbeck, Julien Leider, Tanya Agurs-Collins, Jamie F Chriqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth Piekarz-PorterSchool of Law, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: epiekarz@uic.edu.
Juliana CohenSchool of Nursing and Health Sciences, Merrimack College, North Andover, Massachusetts; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca M SchermbeckInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Julien LeiderInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Tanya Agurs-CollinsHealth Behaviors Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Jamie F ChriquiSchool of Law, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFederal child nutrition programs are a key part of the nutrition safety net, but cost serves as a key participation barrier for students. This can also lead to meal debt for schools when students are unable to pay for the meals they take. The US Department of Agriculture Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) seeks to address these challenges by providing free meals to all students within lower-income schools or school districts. Whereas pandemic-related waivers provided universal school meals nationwide, once the waivers expired, states were again confronted with meal participation barriers.

objectiveTo examine the prevalence of state laws addressing CEP and universal school meals.

designContent analysis. State laws effective as of December 31, 2023, were obtained from commercial legal databases and coded using an ordinal coding scheme as part of the National Cancer Institute's Classification of Laws Associated with School Students system. PARTICIPANTS/

settingStatutes and regulations were collected in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

main outcome measuresMeasures included degree to which laws provided access to free breakfast and/or lunch, reporting requirements for school/district CEP compliance/implementation, waivers from expanded meal access requirements based on feasibility, additional reimbursement to provide free meals, and temporary funding or programs with funding contingencies. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Percent agreement and kappa statistics assessed the interrater reliability of the coding scheme. Descriptive statistics were computed to examine the prevalence of specific items in state laws.

resultsMean percent agreement was 97% and mean kappa was 0.856 across the items coded. Thirty states' laws aimed to reduce the cost burden of school breakfast and/or lunch through the use of CEP and/or other universal meal initiatives. Specific to lunch policy, 12 states' laws mandated that when students qualify for reduced-priced lunch, they must be served a lunch at no cost. Other laws varied based on identified student percentage-the percent of students directly certified as eligible for free meals through participation in other means-tested programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; 1 state's law mandated CEP participation at identified student percentage above 40%, 2 states' laws at identified student percentage of 40%, and 10 states' laws required universal free lunch.

conclusionsFederal programs such as CEP can be used by states to leverage all available funding to help feed children. State laws can act as a springboard toward broader healthy school meals for all initiatives.

Indexed as

Eligibility DeterminationFood AssistanceFood ServicesSchoolsChildHumansLunchMealsNutrition PolicyPovertyState GovernmentStudentsUnited StatesUnited States Department of AgricultureCommunity Eligibility ProvisionFood insecurityLegal epidemiologySchool mealsState law

Identifiers

PMID39947395
PMCPMC13364127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.