Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39947222›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025

Ancient Egyptian Mummified Bodies: Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Their Smell.

Emma Paolin, Cecilia Bembibre, Fabiana Di Gianvincenzo, Julio Cesar Torres-Elguera, Randa Deraz, Ida Kraševec, Ahmed Abdellah, Asmaa Ahmed, Irena Kralj Cigić, Abdelrazek Elnaggar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Emma PaolinHeritage Science Laboratory Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Cecilia BembibreInstitute for Sustainable Heritage, University College London, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN, U.K.
Fabiana Di GianvincenzoHeritage Science Laboratory Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Julio Cesar Torres-ElgueraDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Quality Sciences and Product Management, Krakow University of Economics, Henryka Sienkiewicza 4, Krakow 30-033, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6598-5304
Randa DerazHeritage Science Laboratory Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Ida KraševecHeritage Science Laboratory Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Ahmed AbdellahThe Egyptian Museum in Cairo, Cairo 4272083, Egypt.
Asmaa AhmedThe Egyptian Museum in Cairo, Cairo 4272083, Egypt.
Irena Kralj CigićHeritage Science Laboratory Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Abdelrazek ElnaggarHeritage Science Laboratory Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Ali AbdelhalimThe Egyptian Museum in Cairo, Cairo 4272083, Egypt.
Tomasz SawoszczukDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Quality Sciences and Product Management, Krakow University of Economics, Henryka Sienkiewicza 4, Krakow 30-033, Poland.
Matija StrličHeritage Science Laboratory Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-9036-9773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancient Egyptian mummification was a mortuary practice aimed at preserving the body and soul for the afterlife, achieved through a detailed ritual of embalming using oils, waxes, and balms. While most research on Egyptian mummified bodies has so far been conducted in European collections, our study focuses on the collection of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. The goal was to evaluate whether contemporary smells reflect the mummification materials and, if so, what information can be of value to collection interpretation and conservation. We combined panel-based sensory analyses with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-olfactometry (GC-MS-O), microbiological analysis, and historical and conservation research. Apart from differences in odor intensity, the sensory analyses highlighted common olfactory descriptors for all samples: "woody", "spicy", and "sweet". GC-MS-O identified four categories of volatiles based on their origin: (i) original mummification materials; (ii) plant oils used for conservation; (iii) synthetic pesticides; and (iv) microbiological deterioration products. However, the use of insect repellents similar in composition to the original mummification materials makes it challenging to attribute the origin of some compounds. Clusters based on the chemical and olfactory profiles of the smells emerged, suggesting similarities based on the archeological period, conservation treatments, and materiality.

Indexed as

MummiesOdorantsSmellEgyptEmbalmingGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansOlfactometry

Identifiers

PMID39947222
PMCPMC11869298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.