ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Identification of CNTN2 as a genetic modifier of PIGA-CDG in a family with incomplete penetrance and in Drosophila.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A drug repurposing screen reveals dopamine signaling as a candidate therapeutic pathway for PIGA-CDG.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- A drug repurposing screen reveals dopamine signaling as a candidate therapeutic pathway for PIGA-CDG.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Role of CNTN6 in neurodevelopment and neuropathology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Derived Diverse Regulated Cell Death Patterns for Therapeutic Target Identification in Glaucoma.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Loss-of-function mutations in the X chromosome gene PIGA lead to phosphatidylinositol glycan class A congenital disorder of glycosylation (PIGA-CDG), an ultra-rare CDG typically presenting with seizures, hypotonia, and neurodevelopmental delay. We identified two brothers (probands) with PIGA-CDG, presenting with epilepsy and mild developmental delay. Both probands carry PIGA c.395C>G (p.Ser132Cys), an ultra-rare variant predicted to be damaging. Strikingly, the maternal grandfather and a great uncle also carry the same PIGA variant, but neither presents with symptoms associated with PIGA-CDG. We hypothesized that genetic modifiers might contribute to this reduced penetrance. Using whole-genome sequencing and pedigree analysis, we identified possible susceptibility variants found in the probands and not in the carriers and possible protective variants found in the carriers and not in the probands. Candidate genetic modifier variants included heterozygous, damaging variants in three genes involved directly in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesis and additional variants in other glycosylation pathways or encoding GPI-anchored proteins. Using a Drosophila eye-based model, we tested modifiers identified through genome sequencing. Loss of CNTN2, a predicted protective modifier that encodes a GPI-anchored protein responsible for neuron/glial interactions, rescues loss of PIGA in the eye-based model, as we predict in the family. Further testing found that the loss of CNTN2 also rescues PIGA-CDG-specific phenotypes, including seizures and climbing defects in Drosophila neurological models of PIGA-CDG. Using pedigree information, genome sequencing, and in vivo testing, we identified CNTN2 as a strong candidate modifier that could explain the incomplete penetrance in this family. Identifying and studying rare disease modifier genes in families may lead to therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.