ArticleSurgery2025
Expert consensus for key components of a high-quality ventral hernia repair operative note.
Article in Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVentral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most commonly performed procedures by surgeons; however, there remains a lack of consensus for key components of operative reporting. Prior literature has identified several key elements that are recommended for inclusion in ventral hernia repair operative notes, but it is unclear whether these details alone make for a high-quality operative note. This study sought to determine whether experts agree on what factors make a ventral hernia repair operative note high-quality. STUDY
designA prospective exploratory sequential survey-based mixed-methods design was used for round 1. Conclusions via thematic analysis from survey responses were used to establish themes/subthemes to be included in a high-quality ventral hernia repair operative note. Round 2 used a convergent design and sought to evaluate the importance of these identified themes/subthemes.
resultsTwenty-four surgeons were approached, 16 of whom completed both rounds. Nine themes and 3 subthemes were identified as essential for inclusion in a high-quality ventral hernia repair operative note. Round 2 determined that the 5 most important themes to include are accurate/adequate/pertinent details, clarity in writing, detailed/specific/comprehensive information, objective reporting of findings and procedures, and justification/rationale for decisions.
conclusionBased on expert consensus, this study suggests that high-quality operative notes require more than just detailed information. Instead, they must incorporate qualities spanning the 9 identified themes to ensure clarity, comprehensiveness, and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.