Trial reportResearch in developmental disabilities2025
Impact of fidget devices on anxiety and physiological responses in adults with ADHD.
Trial report in Research in developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of different light spectra on locomotion, anxiety, and heart rate in spontaneously hypertensive rats and Wistar-Kyoto rats.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFidgeting devices are popular for managing ADHD, but their effectiveness remains unclear. This study investigated whether fidgeting modulates self-regulation in adults with ADHD during stress, exploring intrinsic versus extrinsic fidgeting with a fidget ball. We hypothesized that individuals with a fidget ball would demonstrate improved self-regulation under stress, reflected by higher heart rate variability (HRV) and lower anxiety levels.
methodsAdults with ADHD were randomly assigned to a fidget ball (n = 49) or no fidget ball (n = 24) group. Physiological stress was measured via HRV and intrinsic fidgeting, that is, ankle and wrist movements, were measured via actigraphy. Physiological data were collected at baseline and during the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Self-rated anxiety was measured using the State Anxiety Inventory.
resultsHeart rate and fidgeting increased across TSST stages for both groups, with no significant differences in heart rate, HRV, or intrinsic fidgeting between groups. Notably, the fidget ball group had weaker correlations between fidgeting and HRV compared to the no fidget ball group. At baseline, the no fidget ball group showed a positive correlation between intrinsic fidgeting and HRV, suggesting an association between intrinsic fidgeting and self-regulation, however during stress the no fidget ball group showed a significant negative correlation between intrinsic fidgeting and HRV. The relationship between physiological measures and anxiety differed between groups and TSST stages.
conclusionsThese results provide preliminary evidence that the fidget ball may disrupt the expected association between intrinsic fidgeting and HRV, emphasizing the need for further studies to explore its impact on self-regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.