Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39946690›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Understanding the Engagement and Interaction of Superusers and Regular Users in UK Respiratory Online Health Communities: Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis.

Xiancheng Li, Emanuela Vaghi, Gabriella Pasi, Neil S Coulson, Anna De Simoni, Marco Viviani, AD HOC Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiancheng Li *School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0003-3734-1634
Emanuela Vaghi *Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-5166-781X
Gabriella PasiDepartment of Informatics, Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6080-8170
Neil S CoulsonSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-909X
Anna De Simoni *Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6955-0885
Marco Viviani *Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2274-9050
AD HOC GroupSee Acknowledgments, .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline health communities (OHCs) enable people with long-term conditions (LTCs) to exchange peer self-management experiential information, advice, and support. Engagement of "superusers," that is, highly active users, plays a key role in holding together the community and ensuring an effective exchange of support and information. Further studies are needed to explore regular users' interactions with superusers, their sentiments during interactions, and their ultimate impact on the self-management of LTCs.

objectiveThis study aims to gain a better understanding of sentiment distribution and the dynamic of sentiment of posts from 2 respiratory OHCs, focusing on regular users' interaction with superusers.

methodsWe conducted sentiment analysis on anonymized data from 2 UK respiratory OHCs hosted by Asthma UK (AUK), and the British Lung Foundation (BLF) charities between 2006-2016 and 2012-2016, respectively, using the Bio-Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BioBERT), a pretrained language representation model. Given the scarcity of health-related labeled datasets, BioBERT was fine-tuned on the COVID-19 Twitter Dataset. Positive, neutral, and negative sentiments were categorized as 1, 0, and -1, respectively. The average sentiment of aggregated posts by regular users and superusers was then calculated. Superusers were identified based on a definition already used in our previous work (ie, "the 1% users with the largest number of posts over the observation period") and VoteRank, (ie, users with the best spreading ability). Sentiment analyses of posts by superusers defined with both approaches were conducted for correlation.

resultsThe fine-tuned BioBERT model achieved an accuracy of 0.96. The sentiment of posts was predominantly positive (60% and 65% of overall posts in AUK and BLF, respectively), remaining stable over the years. Furthermore, there was a tendency for sentiment to become more positive over time. Overall, superusers tended to write shorter posts characterized by positive sentiment (63% and 67% of all posts in AUK and BLF, respectively). Superusers defined by posting activity or VoteRank largely overlapped (61% in AUK and 79% in BLF), showing that users who posted the most were also spreaders. Threads initiated by superusers typically encouraged regular users to reply with positive sentiments. Superusers tended to write positive replies in threads started by regular users whatever the type of sentiment of the starting post (ie, positive, neutral, or negative), compared to the replies by other regular users (62%, 51%, 61% versus 55%, 45%, 50% in AUK; 71%, 62%, 64% versus 65%, 56%, 57% in BLF, respectively; P<.001, except for neutral sentiment in AUK, where P=.36).

conclusionsNetwork and sentiment analyses provide insight into the key sustaining role of superusers in respiratory OHCs, showing they tend to write and trigger regular users' posts characterized by positive sentiment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSocial MediaAsthmaCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Self-ManagementUnited Kingdomasthmabio-bidirectional encoder representations from transformerschronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseonline health communitiessentiment analysissocial mediasocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID39946690
PMCPMC11888069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.