ArticleJournal of global health2025
The burden of COVID-19 death for different cancer types: a large population-based study.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Viral mutations and immune dysfunction still lead to recurrent infections of COVID-19 in cancer patients. Our aim in this study was to explore the differences in cumulative risk of COVID-19 death from different cancer types and characterise clinical and demographic factors associated with COVID-19 death. Methods: We conducted a population-based study using the National Cancer Database, which included all cancer types. We calculated age-standardised mortality, cancer mortality, and COVID-19 mortality. Further, we employed a multivariate competing risk analysis to calculate the cumulative risk of COVID-19 death in different cancer types. Results: 5.3% of cancer patients suffered from COVID-19 death. The highest COVID-19 mortality was in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, while lung and bronchus cancer exhibited lower risk. Notably, years from cancer diagnosis independently predict COVID-19 death. The hazard ratios (HR) in different types of cancers were as follows: lung and bronchus cancer HR = 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.20-1.40, P < 0.001), colon and rectum cancer HR = 1.22 (95% CI = 1.16-1.29, P < 0.001), urinary bladder cancer HR = 1.22 (95% CI = 1.15-1.30, P < 0.001), non-Hodgkin lymphoma HR = 1.17 (95% CI = 1.11-1.23, P < 0.001), kidney cancer HR = 1.15 (95% CI = 1.06-1.24, P < 0.001), and breast cancer HR = 1.11 (95% CI = 1.06-1.16, P < 0.001). Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgical resection did not significantly correlate with COVID-19 death. Conclusions: We revealed the burden of COVID-19 death across different cancer types. COVID-19 mortality was highest in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and prostate cancer, while patients with lung and bronchus cancer had a lower risk. Years from diagnosis independently predict COVID-19 death. Based on the results, we support more prompt risk assessment and treatment for various types of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.