ArticleJournal of global health2025
Synergising universal health coverage and global health security in the Western Pacific Region.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Service Coverage and Financial Hardship Under Universal Health Coverage: Uneven Associations Across 159 Countries (2000-2023).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Universal health coverage (UHC) and global health security (GHS) should be pursued synergistically to strengthen health systems. However, existing studies found that the efforts toward the two agendas were divergent worldwide. We reviewed the synergy status between UHC and GHS in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) to provide evidence for decision-makers to promote synergy. Methods: We collected the UHC service coverage index (UHC SCI) and the GHS index (GHSI) scores. We created a four-quadrant diagram to discover the gap in UHC and GHS capacities within WPR and divide WPR countries into four groups based on the global mean scores. Further, we adopted global spatial autocorrelation analysis to discover spatial aggregations of high and low scores by calculating Moran's I. In addition, we conducted a correlation analysis to assess the synergy level in WPR and reveal the gap between Pacific Island countries or territories (PICTs) and non-PICTs. We conducted key informant interviews to uncover actual scenarios and address gaps in the quantitative evidence. Results: Compared to the global mean UHC SCI and GHSI scores, nine out of 13 non-PICTs had higher scores, while all 14 of the PICTs had lower scores for both indexes. The Moran's I for WPR countries' UHC SCI and GHSI scores in 2021 were 0.20 and 0.23, respectively (Z-score >2.58; P < 0.01). The correlation coefficients between the two index scores were 0.722 (P < 0.001) at the global level and 0.869 (P < 0.001) at WPR. Within the WPR, the correlation coefficients were 0.859 (P < 0.001) in the non-PICTs and -0.026 (P > 0.05) in the PICTs. Conclusions: The synergy level between UHC and GHS was high in the WPR, but this mainly came from the synergy in the non-PICTs. The two agendas have barely synergised the PICTs. To build a safer and healthier WPR, it is important to pay more attention to the countries that have weaker health capacities in the region and narrow the gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.