ArticlePloS one2025
The effect of a cognitive dual-task on the control of wheelchair propulsion.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline Error Performance and Reliability of a Wheelchair Balance Task in Para Sport Athletes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Incorporation of a dual-task cognitive exercise during unsupported seated balance in collegiate para athletes.Frontiers in cognition · 2026Article
- Validity of IMUs in Comparison to a Marker-Based-Motion Capture System for Spatio-Temporal Parameters During Wheelchair Propulsion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cognitive-motor interference in multiple sclerosis revisited: a dual-task paradigm using wearable inertial sensors and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the impact of task-sequencing on cognitive and motor performance in MS: PASAT and 3-minute walk test order effects.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Movement analyses of wheelchair users are rarely integrated into clinical operations, although these are recommended to prevent pain and injury in the upper extremity. In addition, previous movement analyses in the laboratory do not include the possible influences of distractions that occur in everyday wheelchair use. We therefore transferred the dual-task method known from the motion analysis of walkers to the analysis of the propulsion behavior of wheelchair users and examined whether the changes resulting from the additional cognitive task also show up here. The 52 participants consisted of 38 manual wheelchair users (age = 43.8 ± 14.2 years; sex = 11/27 f/m) and 14 novices (age = 39.2 ± 15.4 years; sex = 8/6 f/m). The participants propelled their wheelchairs on a test stand and movements of hand and wheel were recorded with a marker-based 3D motion-capturing system. The measurements were performed at preferred speed under single- and dual-task conditions. The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) was used for the additional cognitive task. The participants propelled with a significantly higher frequency (p = 0.001), had a shorter cycle- (p = 0.001) and recovery time (p = 0.001) and propelled with a lower push angle (p = 0.045) under dual-task conditions. The distance between the hand and the pushrim was shorter (p = 0.008) and the distance between the hand and the axis was significantly longer (p = 0.004). The differences occurred predominantly in the group of manual wheelchair users. Significant differences in propulsion behavior were also found between the two groups under both single-task and dual-task conditions. The results indicate that dual-task conditions during wheelchair propulsion have an influence on spatiotemporal parameters similar to walking. Future movement analyses of wheelchair users should therefore consider the additional measurement under dual-task conditions in order to obtain more realistic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.