Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39946428›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological treatments to improve sleep quality in university students.

Michelle Tadros, Jill M Newby, Sophie Li, Aliza Werner-Seidler

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle TadrosThe Black Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1995-9989
Jill M NewbyThe Black Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Sophie LiThe Black Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4762-6911
Aliza Werner-SeidlerThe Black Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (1197074National Health and Medical Research Council 2008839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis paper reviews the literature evaluating psychological treatments to improve sleep quality in young adult university students.

methodParticipants (N = 6179) were young adult (aged 18-30 years) university students. Databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, EMBASE and Medline) were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating psychological treatments for sleep disturbance in university students. The search date was 20 September 2024.

results22 original trials met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that psychological interventions outperformed control groups (n = 14) on improving sleep quality (g = 0.50, 95%CI:0.26-0.73). There were significantly different effect sizes found between studies that evaluated cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia (CBT-I; n = 6, g = 0.72, CI: 0.43-1.02) versus studies that evaluated mindfulness interventions (n = 5, g = 0.16, 95% CI: -0.18-0.51).

conclusionsPsychological treatments improve sleep quality for young adult university students. While CBT-I showed larger effect sizes than interventions focused on mindfulness, further research is needed to verify if this reflects a true difference in the efficacy of the interventions.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapySleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSleep QualityStudentsAdolescentAdultHumansMindfulnessRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39946428
PMCPMC11824969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.