ArticlePloS one2025
Home cage-based insights into motor learning and strategy adaptation in a Huntington disease mouse model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Huntington disease (HD) is a genetic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive motor dysfunction, cognitive decline, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Assessing early motor skill deficits in HD mouse models is challenging with traditional behavioral tasks. This study uses a home cage-based lever-pulling task, PiPaw2.0, to evaluate motor learning in 6-7 months-old zQ175 knock-in HD mice in a more naturalistic environment. In this task, mice learn to pull a lever for a water reward, with the requirement to hold the lever within a specific goal range for a required hold time. As the mice improved, the required hold time increased, thereby gradually increasing the task demands. Both wild type (WT) and zQ175 mice initially showed similar task engagement, but zQ175 mice had significant deficits in adapting to increasing hold time. The WT mice refined their strategies over time, shifting from random to more precise lever pulls, while zQ175 mice failed to make this adjustment, maintaining erratic performance. Additionally, in group-housing WT mouse lever performance benefited from peer interactions, an effect absent in zQ175 mice. Post-task neural assessments revealed that WT mice developed experience-mediated synaptic plasticity in the left striatum (contralateral to lever-pulling paw), while zQ175 mice showed no significant changes, consistent with known corticostriatal plasticity impairments in HD mouse models. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of group-housed, home cage-based assessments for evaluating motor learning and adaptation in HD mouse models. This study provides insights into the motor control and adaptive learning deficits in HD, emphasizing the value of automated home cage systems in advancing neurodegenerative disease research and highlighting the importance of peer influences on performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.