ArticlePloS one2025
FORCETRACKER: A versatile tool for standardized assessment of tissue contractile properties in 3D Heart-on-Chip platforms.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-dependent effects and mechanisms of exercise-like stimulation on cardiac injury and contractile function: outcomes of the MICRO-ATHLETE study.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
- Quantifying the spatiotemporal mechanical dynamics of engineered cardiac microbundles.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Tapered Pillar Design for High-Precision Force Readout in Miniaturized Engineered Heart Tissues From Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineered heart tissues (EHTs) have shown great potential in recapitulating tissue organization, functions, and cell-cell interactions of the human heart in vitro. Currently, multiple EHT platforms are used by both industry and academia for different applications, such as drug discovery, disease modelling, and fundamental research. The tissues' contractile force, one of the main hallmarks of tissue function and maturation level of cardiomyocytes, can be read out from EHT platforms by optically tracking the movement of elastic pillars induced by the contractile tissues. However, existing optical tracking algorithms which focus on calculating the contractile force are customized and platform-specific, often not available to the broad research community, and thus hamper head-to-head comparison of the model output. Therefore, there is the need for robust, standardized and platform-independent software for tissues' force assessment. To meet this need, we developed ForceTracker: a standalone and computationally efficient software for analyzing contractile properties of tissues in different EHT platforms. The software uses a shape-detection algorithm to single out and track the movement of pillars' tips for the most common shapes of EHT platforms. In this way, we can obtain information about tissues' contractile performance. ForceTracker is coded in Python and uses a multi-threading approach for time-efficient analysis of large data sets in multiple formats. The software efficiency to analyze circular and rectangular pillar shapes is successfully tested by analyzing different format videos from two EHT platforms, developed by different research groups. We demonstrate robust and reproducible performance of the software in the analysis of tissues over time and in various conditions. ForceTracker's detection and tracking shows low sensitivity to common incidental defects, such as alteration of tissue shape or air bubbles. Detection accuracy is determined via comparison with manual measurements using the software ImageJ. We developed ForceTracker as a tool for standardized analysis of contractile performance in EHT platforms to facilitate research on disease modeling and drug discovery in academia and industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.