ArticlePloS one2025
The machine learning algorithm based on decision tree optimization for pattern recognition in track and field sports.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of different approaches for performance enhancement in elite sport.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Adaptive training load optimization for track and field athletes: A reinforcement learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Trustworthy AI for medical decisions: Adversarially robust and fair machine learning prediction for Parkinson's disease.PloS one · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence strategies based on random forests for detecting ischemia-reperfusion injury changes in kidney tissue during intravital imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to solve the problems of insufficient accuracy and low efficiency of the existing methods in sprint pattern recognition to optimize the training and competition strategies of athletes. Firstly, the data collected in this study come from high-precision sensors and computer simulation, involving key biomechanical parameters in sprint, such as step frequency, stride length and acceleration. The dataset covers multiple tests of multiple athletes, ensuring the diversity of samples. Secondly, an optimized machine learning algorithm based on decision tree is adopted. It combines the advantages of Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT), and improves the accuracy and efficiency of the model in sprint pattern recognition by adaptively adjusting the hyperparameter and tree structure. Specifically, by introducing adaptive feature selection and ensemble learning methods, the decision tree algorithm effectively improves the recognition ability of the model for different athletes and sports states, thus reducing the over-fitting phenomenon and improving the generalization ability. In the process of model training, cross-validation and grid search optimization methods are adopted to ensure the reasonable selection of super parameters. Moreover, the superiority of the model is verified by comparing with the commonly used algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The accuracy rate on the test set is 94.9%, which is higher than that of SVM (87.0%) and CNN (92.0%). In addition, the optimized decision tree algorithm performs well in computational efficiency. However, the training data of this model comes from the simulation environment, which may deviate from the real game data. Future research can verify the generalization ability of the model through more actual data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.