Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39946360›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Sample Size Impact (SaSii): An R script for estimating optimal sample sizes in population genetics and population genomics studies.

Matheus Scaketti, Patricia Sanae Sujii, Alessandro Alves-Pereira, Kaiser Dias Schwarcz, Ana Flávia Francisconi, Matheus Sartori Moro, Kauanne Karolline Moreno Martins, Thiago Araujo de Jesus, Guilherme Brener Ferreira de Souza, Maria Imaculada Zucchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matheus ScakettiBiology Institute, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3753-4156
Patricia Sanae SujiiBiology Institute, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alessandro Alves-PereiraDepartment of Genetics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Kaiser Dias SchwarczFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Brasília-Campus Recanto das Emas, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Ana Flávia FrancisconiDepartment of Genetics, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Matheus Sartori MoroBiology Institute, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kauanne Karolline Moreno MartinsBiology Institute, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago Araujo de JesusApplied Biology Laboratory, Centro de Ensino Unificado do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-2532-696X
Guilherme Brener Ferreira de SouzaApplied Biology Laboratory, Centro de Ensino Unificado do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Maria Imaculada ZucchiDepartment of Genetics, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obtaining large sample sizes for genetic studies can be challenging, time-consuming, and expensive, and small sample sizes may generate biased or imprecise results. Many studies have suggested the minimum sample size necessary to obtain robust and reliable results, but it is not possible to define one ideal minimum sample size that fits all studies. Here, we present SaSii (Sample Size Impact), an R script to help researchers define the minimum sample size. Based on empirical and simulated data analysis using SaSii, we present patterns and suggest minimum sample sizes for experiment design. The patterns were obtained by analyzing previously published genotype datasets with SaSii and can be used as a starting point for the sample design of population genetics and genomic studies. Our results showed that it is possible to estimate an adequate sample size that accurately represents the real population without requiring the scientist to write any program code, extract and sequence samples, or use population genetics programs, thus simplifying the process. We also confirmed that the minimum sample sizes for SNP (single-nucleotide polymorphism) analysis are usually smaller than for SSR (simple sequence repeat) analysis and discussed other patterns observed from empirical plant and animal datasets.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenomicsMetagenomicsSoftwareAnimalsGenotypeHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSample Size

Identifiers

PMID39946360
PMCPMC11824989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.