ArticleNursing open2025
A High Fall Risk Patient Perspective-Reducing Safety Challenges in an Acute Care Hospital.
Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Patients' Perceptions of the Contributing Factors That Led to Falling in Acute Care Hospitals During Their Hospitalisation.Nursing open · 2025Pooled it
- From information to action- a phase-based analysis of patient engagement in inpatient fall prevention: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- A five-year retrospective study of patient falls in a tertiary hospital: frequency, characteristics, and contributing factors.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study examined patient perspectives of the factors that contributed to their falls in a medical ward and how patient understanding of the implemented fall prevention strategies influenced their perceptions of their fall risk.
designAn exploratory sequential mixed methods design.
methodsQuantitative data were obtained from the RiskMan fall database and auditing of the Patient-Centred Care Plan to identify patients who experienced a fall on the ward. From this cohort, seven inpatients were interviewed using a structured interview questionnaire to explore their perceptions of why they fell. Other complexities of fall management in the ward were discussed, including the assessment and identification of high fall risk patients and the effectiveness of patient education.
resultsFive contributing factors were seen to have led to inpatient falls in the medical ward: (1) there seems to be little, if any, patient engagement with the advice in the fall prevention brochure distributed on admission; (2) insufficient patient awareness of the various fall prevention strategies; (3) inadequate bathroom supervision provided by nurses; (4) patient call bells not answered promptly, which encouraged patients engaging in risk-taking behaviour and (5) a breakdown in communication between nursing staff and patients. The study identified several factors that should be included in fall administrative data, such as the duration of call-bell response, the quality of nurse-patient communication and the determinants influencing patient response to fall prevention strategies. The study findings offer valuable insights to enhance the efficacy and implementation of fall prevention strategies to improve patient outcomes. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Patients who had experienced a fall during their current hospital admission were interviewed. For each patient, the interview was a communication medium to explore the factors surrounding the occurrence of their fall and their knowledge of their fall risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.