ArticleJCI insight2025
Genotype-phenotype correlation in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.
Article in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dermatologic Features of Endocrine Tumor Syndromes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Genetic testing in pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society International Consensus Statement.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Associations of selected atypical non-neuroendocrine cancers with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Current Medical Controversies in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of clinically suspected multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDAmong patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), 80% develop duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (dpNETs), of whom 15%-25% die of metastasis. There is a need to identify biomarkers to predict aggressive disease. MEN1 genotype affords an attractive possibility as a biomarker, as it remains constant during life. Currently, patients are clinically diagnosed with MEN1 by the presence of ≥2 primary endocrine tumors (pituitary, parathyroid, and pancreas) or ≥1 primary endocrine tumor with a positive family history. From 10% to 30% of patients diagnosed clinically with MEN1 have no pathogenic germline MEN1 variants.METHODSThis was a retrospective study of 162 index patients or probands with genotype-positive and 47 with genotype-negative MEN1 enrolled from 1977 to 2022.RESULTSCompared with patients with genotype-negative disease, patients with genotype-positive disease were younger at diagnosis and had an increased frequency of recurrent parathyroid tumors, dpNETs, and angiofibromas or collagenomas. We propose a weighted scoring system to diagnose genotype-positive MEN1 based on clinical characteristics. No evidence of MEN1 mosaicism was seen in 30 tumors from 17 patients with genotype-negative MEN1. Patients with germline MEN1 variants in exons 2 and 3 had a reduced risk of distant metastases.CONCLUSIONThe clinical course of genotype-negative MEN1 is distinct from genotype-positive disease, raising uncertainty about the benefits of lifetime surveillance in patients with genotype-negative disease. MEN1 mosaicism is rare.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04969926FUNDINGIntramural Research Program of National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH (ZIA DK043006-46).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.