Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39946181›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Digital Transformation in Patient Organizations: Interview and Focus Group Study.

Simon Wallraf, Sara Köthemann, Claudia Wiesemann, Sabine Wöhlke, Marie-Luise Dierks, Marion Andrea Schmidt, Henk Jasper van Gils-Schmidt, Jonas Lander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon WallrafInstitute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8553-2844
Sara KöthemannDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-5919-6553
Claudia WiesemannDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8260-0346
Sabine WöhlkeDepartment of Health Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7679-085X
Marie-Luise DierksInstitute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-6048
Marion Andrea SchmidtDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8685-2455
Henk Jasper van Gils-SchmidtDepartment of Health Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-1280
Jonas LanderInstitute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-3307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient organizations (POs) are an integral part of the health care landscape, serving as advocates and support systems for patients and their families. As the digitalization of health care accelerates, POs are challenged to adapt their diverse roles to digital formats. However, the extent and form of POs' digital adaptation and the challenges POs encounter in their digital transformation remain unexplored.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the digital transformation processes within POs. We examined the types of digital activities and processes implemented, people involved in respective tasks, challenges encountered, and attitudes toward the digitalization of POs.

methodsThe study was carried out by the multicenter interdisciplinary research network Pandora. We adopted a qualitative exploratory approach by conducting 37 semistructured interviews and 2 focus groups with representatives and members of POs in Germany. Results were obtained using a deductive-inductive approach based on a qualitative content analysis. Methods and results were reported in accordance with the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist.

resultsPOs primarily apply basic digital tools to engage in communication, health education, and information dissemination. Some also develop specific mobile apps and collect health data through patient registries. Volunteers cover a considerable part of the workload. Sometimes, POs collaborate with external partners, such as health professionals or other nonprofit organizations. Furthermore, many (13/46, 28%) interviewees referred to the importance of involving members in digitalization efforts to better meet their needs. However, they described the actual practices used to involve members in, for example, developing digital services as limited, passive, or implicit. When evaluating digital transformation processes, representatives and members of POs expressed generally positive attitudes and acknowledged their potential to improve the accessibility of support services, management efficiency, and outreach. Still, resource constraints; the complexity of digital initiatives; and accessibility issues for certain demographic groups, especially older persons, were frequently mentioned as challenges. Several (15/46, 33%) interviewees highlighted POs' increasing responsibility to support their members' digital competencies and digital health literacy.

conclusionsPOs are actively involved in the digital transformation of health services. To navigate challenges and further shape and sustain digital activities and processes, POs may benefit from governance frameworks, that is, a clear plan outlining with whom, how, and with what objectives digital projects are being realized. Support from public, scientific, and policy institutions to enhance the process through training, mentorship, and fostering collaborative networks seems warranted.

Indexed as

Voluntary Health AgenciesFocus GroupsGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Researchdigitalizationdigital transformationhealth researchpatient organizationpatient support

Identifiers

PMID39946181
PMCPMC11888101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.