Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39946131›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Mental Health of Residents of Ukraine Exposed to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict.

Jiafu An, Tenghui Wang, Bin Chen, Anatoly Oleksiyenko, Chen Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiafu AnFaculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Tenghui WangFaculty of Business, Lingnan University, Hong Kong SAR.
Bin ChenFaculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Anatoly OleksiyenkoDepartment of International Education, Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Chen LinFaculty of Business and Economics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Quantifying the association between the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and Ukrainians' mental health is crucial for guiding reconstruction and rebuilding efforts in the postwar period. Objective: To examine the association between war exposure and civilians' mental health in both the short and medium term and the potential channels through which these associations occur. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from 7 nationally representative surveys conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology between December 4, 2015, and July 18, 2022. Six surveys were conducted before the war and one during the ongoing conflict in July 2022. Each survey included approximately 2000 respondents aged 18 to 95 years in 110 localities. Exposure: The magnitude of war damage exposure was represented by an indicator variable set to 1 if an oblast (province) experienced severe war damage and 0 if the damage was moderate at the time of the survey. The classification of severe or moderate damage was based on the economic losses incurred. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were respondents' self-reported thoughts of suicide and feelings of helplessness, both represented as dummy variables. Results: The sample included 14 140 respondents, with 3933 (27.8%) exposed to severe war damage and 10 207 (72.2%) to moderate war damage. These included 8174 female respondents (57.8%), with an overall mean (SD) age of 48.9 (16.8) years. The differences in the likelihood of reporting suicidal thoughts and feelings of helplessness between areas with severe vs moderate war damage increased by 2.2 percentage points (β estimate, 0.022 [SE, 0.006]; 95% CI, 0.009-0.036) and 4.9 percentage points (β estimate, 0.049 [SE, 0.019]; 95% CI, 0.009-0.088), respectively. Subsample analyses revealed that male respondents were more vulnerable to suicidal thoughts (β estimate, 0.030 [SE, 0.013]; 95% CI, 0.004-0.056), while female respondents were more at risk of feelings of helplessness (β estimate, 0.063 [SE, 0.024]; 95% CI, 0.013-0.113). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of war exposure, bombing was associated with increased mental health concerns among civilians, including a higher likelihood of suicidal thoughts and feelings of helplessness, which may hinder postwar recovery. These findings suggest that policymakers should prioritize creating job opportunities and ensuring a safe living environment to support citizens' recovery in the aftermath of conflict.

Indexed as

Armed ConflictsMental HealthWarfareWarfare and Armed ConflictsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRussiaSuicidal IdeationUkraine

Identifiers

PMID39946131
PMCPMC11826354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.