ArticleJAMA network open2025
Trends in Axillary Lymph Node Dissection After Mastectomy Among Patients With Limited Nodal Burden.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncological outcomes of omitting axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastasis undergoing mastectomy without radiotherapy.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Receipt of Combined Axillary Dissection and Nodal Irradiation Varies by Age.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Axillary Management Trends and Survival in Men Undergoing Mastectomy with Positive Sentinel Nodes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with pT0-2 ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer with 3-5 Positive Lymph Nodes Undergoing Adjuvant Systemic Therapy and Radiation Does Not Impact Overall Survival: A National Cancer Database Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Trends in postmastectomy radiotherapy for early and locally advanced breast cancer in Switzerland: a population-based cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- From Axillary Lymph Node Dissection to Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: A 23-Year Population-Based Large-Sample Study with Long-Term Survival Outcomes.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Current practices in axillary treatment for patients with breast cancer who receive a mastectomy for node-positive disease are unknown. For patients who receive postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), the addition of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may result in significant overtreatment. Objectives: To evaluate trends in axillary treatment for patients with limited nodal metastases who receive a mastectomy and identify factors that can be targeted to reduce axillary overtreatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients identified from the National Cancer Database who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. Patients included were women aged 18 years or older with clinical (c) T1-T2N0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy with axillary staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and/or ALND and had 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapies were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed from December 2023 to July 2024. Exposure: Axillary management based on ALND and PMRT receipt: (1) ALND alone, (2) PMRT alone, (3) both ALND and PMRT, and (4) neither ALND nor PMRT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Axillary management strategies were evaluated, and clinicopathologic characteristics based on treatment type were compared with multivariable analysis. Results: In total, 62 332 patients were included (median age, 58 years [IQR, 48-68 years]; 82.2% with Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score 0). The proportion of patients who received ALND alone decreased from 47.1% to 17.6% from 2012 to 2021, while the percentage of patients who received PMRT alone increased from 9.8% to 36.8%. Overall, 21.3% of patients received treatment with both ALND and PMRT, with little change over time (from 21.7% in 2012 to 17.7% in 2021). Most patients (88.4%) who received both PMRT and ALND underwent ALND at the same operation as SLNB. Younger age (odds ratio [OR] per year increase, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98-0.98]; P < .001), high-grade tumors (grade 2: OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.09-1.29]; P < .001; grade 3: OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.22-1.48]; P < .001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (OR, 1.26 [1.19-1.33]; P < .001), and larger tumor size (cT2 tumors compared with cT1: OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.03-1.17]; P = .004; upstaging to pathologic T3 tumors: OR, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.15-4.99]; P = .03) were associated with increased likelihood of concurrent treatment with ALND and PMRT. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of patients with breast cancer who received a mastectomy, a substantial proportion of those with 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes were treated with both ALND and PMRT. Delaying the decision for ALND until after multidisciplinary input may reduce overtreatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.