Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39946126›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Trends in Axillary Lymph Node Dissection After Mastectomy Among Patients With Limited Nodal Burden.

Ton Wang, Tyler Jones, Samantha M Thomas, Astrid Botty Van den Bruele, Laura H Rosenberger, Akiko Chiba, Kendra J Modell Parrish, Lesly A Dossett, Jennifer K Plichta, Susan McDuff and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ton WangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Tyler JonesDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Samantha M ThomasDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Astrid Botty Van den BrueleDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Laura H RosenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Akiko ChibaDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Kendra J Modell ParrishDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Lesly A DossettDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Jennifer K PlichtaDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Susan McDuffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Maggie L DiNomeDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
E Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Current practices in axillary treatment for patients with breast cancer who receive a mastectomy for node-positive disease are unknown. For patients who receive postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), the addition of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may result in significant overtreatment. Objectives: To evaluate trends in axillary treatment for patients with limited nodal metastases who receive a mastectomy and identify factors that can be targeted to reduce axillary overtreatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients identified from the National Cancer Database who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. Patients included were women aged 18 years or older with clinical (c) T1-T2N0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy with axillary staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and/or ALND and had 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapies were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed from December 2023 to July 2024. Exposure: Axillary management based on ALND and PMRT receipt: (1) ALND alone, (2) PMRT alone, (3) both ALND and PMRT, and (4) neither ALND nor PMRT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Axillary management strategies were evaluated, and clinicopathologic characteristics based on treatment type were compared with multivariable analysis. Results: In total, 62 332 patients were included (median age, 58 years [IQR, 48-68 years]; 82.2% with Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score 0). The proportion of patients who received ALND alone decreased from 47.1% to 17.6% from 2012 to 2021, while the percentage of patients who received PMRT alone increased from 9.8% to 36.8%. Overall, 21.3% of patients received treatment with both ALND and PMRT, with little change over time (from 21.7% in 2012 to 17.7% in 2021). Most patients (88.4%) who received both PMRT and ALND underwent ALND at the same operation as SLNB. Younger age (odds ratio [OR] per year increase, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98-0.98]; P < .001), high-grade tumors (grade 2: OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.09-1.29]; P < .001; grade 3: OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.22-1.48]; P < .001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (OR, 1.26 [1.19-1.33]; P < .001), and larger tumor size (cT2 tumors compared with cT1: OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.03-1.17]; P = .004; upstaging to pathologic T3 tumors: OR, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.15-4.99]; P = .03) were associated with increased likelihood of concurrent treatment with ALND and PMRT. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of patients with breast cancer who received a mastectomy, a substantial proportion of those with 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes were treated with both ALND and PMRT. Delaying the decision for ALND until after multidisciplinary input may reduce overtreatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionMastectomyAdultAgedAxillaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39946126
PMCPMC11826356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.