ReviewGeroScience2025
Measuring thymic output across the human lifespan: a critical challenge in laboratory medicine.
Review in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thymic Involution and Function in People With HIV and General Population Controls: A Cross-Sectional Analysis From Two Danish Cohort Studies.Aging cell · 2026Article
- Immune aging biomarkers for clinical trials.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Thymus and Leishmania at the Crossroads: Autoimmunity and Cancer.Immunology · 2026Review
- TREC dynamics as a biomarker of naive T-cell homeostasis in traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation may lead to early and prolonged acute thymic involution: findings from a pilot longitudinal study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Thymic central tolerance takes centre stage in autoimmune disease.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Metformin-associated gut microbiota remodeling correlates with reinvigorated splenic immunity in aged mice: microbiome-immune crosstalk via the gut-spleen axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-associated thymic involution leads to a significant decline in thymic T cell output, a major contributor to immunosenescence in the elderly. Accurately measuring thymic output is therefore critical for understanding the mechanisms behind immune aging. Furthermore, robust quantification of thymic output is essential in various other clinical and research settings, including the diagnosis of immunodeficiencies and the monitoring of T cell reconstitution following therapeutic interventions like hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Current methodologies for measuring thymic output include T cell receptor excision circle (TREC) quantification via quantitative polymerase chain reaction and the enumeration of recent thymic emigrants (RTEs) using flow cytometry. However, TREC-based assays are inherently insensitive to subtle changes in thymic output, limiting their applicability beyond neonatal immunodeficiency screening. Similarly, RTE enumeration presents challenges; while surface markers exist for CD4⁺ RTEs, validated markers for CD8⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes are lacking. This represents a significant knowledge gap, particularly as aging has been shown to disproportionally affect the CD8 T cell pool. Moreover, while flow cytometry effectively measures mature naïve T cells, these cells do not accurately represent real-time thymic output, as they can persist in peripheral circulation for extended periods. These limitations highlight the pressing need for more accurate and sensitive methods to assess thymic output. Improved measurement techniques would not only enhance our understanding of thymic involution in the context of aging but also enable large-scale investigations into thymic function and the mechanisms driving its decline in both health and disease. In this review, we examine current methodologies for measuring thymic output in humans, critically evaluate their limitations, and discuss emerging approaches to address these gaps in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.