ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2025
Dwarf Updated Pelican Optimization Algorithm for Depression and Suicide Detection from Social Media.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Detection of Suicidal Ideation: A Scoping Review to Inform Prevention and Psychological Well-Being.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression and suicidal thoughts are significant global health concerns typically diagnosed through clinical assessments, which can be constrained by issues of accessibility and stigma. However, current methods often face challenges with this variability and struggle to integrate different models effectively and generalize across different settings, leading to reduced effectiveness when applied to new contexts, resulting in less accurate outcomes. This research presents a novel approach to suicide and depression detection from social media (SADDSM) by addressing the challenges of variability and model generalization. The process involves four key stages: first, preprocessing the input data through stop word removal, tokenization, and stemming to improve text clarity; then, extracting relevant features such as TF-IDF, style features, and enhanced word2vec features to capture semantic relationships and emotional cues. A modified mutual information score is used for feature fusion, selecting the most informative features. Subsequently, deep learning models like RNN, DBN, and improved LSTM are stacked to form an ensemble model that boosts accuracy while reducing overfitting. The performance is further optimized using the Dwarf Updated Pelican optimization algorithm (DU-POA) to fine-tune model weights, achieving an impressive 0.962 accuracy at 90% training data, outperforming existing techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39946018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.