ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Differences in experiences of patients with advanced cancer in Japan from 3 to 6 years after diagnosis.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCoping with cancer presents significant challenges, especially for those with advanced-stage and long-term survival. However, research on advanced-stage cancer experiences in Japan remains limited. This study analyzed how patient experiences with advanced-stage cancer/long-term survival varied across different diagnosis periods.
methodsWe examined two groups of patients with advanced cancer diagnosed in 2013 and 2016 using data from the Patient Experience Survey, a nationwide survey of cancer patients in Japan in 2019. Weighted analysis was used to estimate the distribution of patient experiences in the representative population. We compared the experiences of patients diagnosed with advanced-stage disease in 2016 (newer diagnosis group) and 2013 (earlier diagnosis group).
resultsWe analyzed 1584 participants in the newer diagnosis group and 412 in the earlier diagnosis group, with response rates of 30.8% and 43.0% respectively (P < 0.01). The earlier group had more proxy responses (38.0% vs. 43.2%). Survey response distribution was similar across groups; however, earlier diagnosis patients reported worse access to treatment information, lower satisfaction, and less positive post-treatment experiences than did newer patients. However, when considering respondent type, patient responses were consistent across years, whereas proxy responses were more negative.
conclusionsDifferences in survey timing and response types significantly impact the reported patient experiences. Policymakers should consider these factors when designing cancer control strategies to support patients and families. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Policymakers should use these findings to enhance cancer control strategies, addressing the distress of patients and families affected by advanced and long-term cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.