ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2025
Enhancement of immune responses to classical swine fever virus E2 in mice by fusion or mixture with the porcine IL-28B.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The E2 subunit vaccine has been considered a promising alternative to an attenuated classical swine fever (CSF) vaccine. However, it fails to induce a good cellular immune response. Given that immunogenic adjuvants can regulate the cellular immunity to achieve a maximum efficacy against antigens, immunostimulatory effects of porcine IL-28B on the CSF virus (CSFV) E2 subunit vaccine were evaluated in the present study. We expressed recombinant proteins E2-IL28B, E2, and IL-28B using CHO-S mammalian cells as an antigen expression platform, and three types of CSFV E2 subunit vaccines based on antigens E2-IL28B, E2 + IL-28B, and E2 were prepared, respectively. We found that both E2-IL28B and E2 + IL-28B antigens exhibited superior immunogenicity with dramatically induced antibody titers and neutralizing antibody levels than the E2 alone. Moreover, E2-IL28B or E2 + IL-28B, instead of E2, boosted cellular immune responses via obviously increasing the percentages of CD3
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.