Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Efficacy of high intensity laser therapy versus sham laser in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The importance of power in photobiomodulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-intensity laser therapy.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of the effects of high-intensity laser therapy and low-level laser therapy in knee osteoarthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Trial
- Dose-optimized HILT promotes peripheral nerve repair through BMP4-Smad9-mediated inhibition of neuroinflammation and oxidative stress.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of six sessions of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT), administered twice a week over three weeks, in reducing pain and improving function in patients with mild to moderate symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Forty patients were randomly assigned to either the HILT group (n = 20) or a sham control group (n = 20). The HILT group received two initial sessions of analgesic mode HILT with a total energy of 600 J at the medial and lateral joint lines, followed by four sessions of biostimulation mode with 3000 J at the medial joint line. Both groups also participated in a supervised home exercise program. The visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and timed up and go test (TUG) were evaluated before treatment and at 3 and 6 weeks after the initial treatment. The VAS and the WOMAC improved significantly in both groups. However, there were no significant differences in any of the measured outcomes between the two groups. Both groups showed no significant improvement in TUG. In treating mild to moderate OA knee, integrating twice a week, 6 sessions (2 sessions of analgesic and 4 sessions of biostimulation mode) HILT to exercise program is not superior to exercise alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39945920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.