Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39945918›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025

Dynamics of pesticide residues in soils during the growing season: a case study in peach orchards, east-central Portugal.

Abel Veloso, Vera Silva, Rima Osman, Maria Paula Simões, Maria do Carmo Horta, Violette Geissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abel VelosoSoil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. abel.veloso@wur.nl.
Vera SilvaSoil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Rima OsmanSoil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Maria Paula SimõesSchool of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal.
Maria do Carmo HortaSchool of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal.
Violette GeissenSoil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2020.06010.BD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Permanent crops rely heavily on pesticides. Their short-term behaviour has already been characterised under laboratory conditions. However, their degradation in the field is still poorly understood. Furthermore, studies that relate pesticide residues in soil with their application history are still scarce, despite their relevance for inferring the historical and diffuse dimensions of pollution. This work explores the spatial and temporal dynamics of pesticide residues in soil under the light of their application records and the accuracy of the predicted environmental concentrations (PEC). To achieve these purposes, 270 soil samples were collected at 5 sampling times over the 2022 growing season, in 18 peach orchards from east-central Portugal. Moreover, the data extracted from the application records was used to obtain predicted levels which were compared with the measured results. A total of 37 residues were analysed. Overall, 32 of these were detected back in, at least, one sample. Glyphosate and AMPA were the most frequently found and had the highest median concentrations. The comparison between predicted and measured environmental concentrations (MEC) suggests that pesticide decay was generally slower than expected. Glyphosate, AMPA, fluopyram and tebuconazole showed a high potential for resulting in background concentrations in soil. Our results highlight the need for regular and comprehensive monitoring, being recommended long-term assessments of the persistence and fate of pesticides under realistic conditions. Furthermore, our results also stress the necessity of more studies on reasons for PEC-MEC mismatch, a factor of concern considering the regulatory relevance of PEC values.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPesticide ResiduesPrunus persicaSoilSoil PollutantsAgriculturePortugalSeasonsPesticide ResiduesSoilSoil PollutantsMulti-residue analysisPeach orchardsPesticide residuesPredicted versus measured environmental concentrations

Identifiers

PMID39945918
PMCPMC11825562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.