ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Comparison of the 2-year clinical performances of class II restorations using different restorative materials.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06894186 (Comparison of the Functional Properties of Two Injectable Materials in Posterior Teeth), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Functional Properties of Two Injectable Materials in Posterior Teeth: Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term clinical and micromorphological comparison of injectable and paste composites in occlusal cavities.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Flexural strength and fracture load of high-flow bulk-fill and conventional composites in ISO 4049 bars and MOD cavity models: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- One-Year Clinical Performance of Injectable and Paste-Type Composite Resins in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Acid Etching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of Two Resin Composite Materials in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An Observational Study.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Micro-CT evaluation of internal adaptation in composite restorations using incremental and sonic-activated techniques.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Highly Filled Flowable Composite Resins as Sole Restorative Materials: A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the two-year clinical performance of conventional composite, bulk-fill composite, and high-filler flowable composite in Class II cavities. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 259 Class II restorations were performed in 110 patients, applying Clearfil Majesty Posterior (Clearfil) as the conventional composite, Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative (Filtek) as the bulk-fill composite, and G-aenial Universal Injectable (G-aenial) as the high-fill flowable composite. G-Premio Bond, a universal adhesive system, was applied for all composite resin restorations. Restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria after 2 years. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests.
resultsAt the end of two years, the group treated with Clearfil has showed a significantly higher surface gloss score compared to the G-aenial and Filtek groups. Additionally, it was seen that the marginal adaptation scores of the Clearfil group were similar to the Filtek group and significantly higher than the G-aenial group. In intra-group evaluations, the contact point scores of the Clearfil group showed a statistically significant increase compared to baseline and one-year follow-up assessments. The marginal adaptation scores of the Clearfil and Filtek groups also exhibited a statistically significant increase compared to baseline and one-year follow-up assessments.
conclusionsHigh-filler flowable composite and bulk-fill composite exhibited better clinical properties regarding surface gloss compared to conventional composite. It was observed that the marginal adaptation property of the conventional composite were similar to the bulk-fill composite and lower than the high- filler flowable composite. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The composite resins tested showed similar results in most of the scores evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.