ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Use of machine learning algorithms to construct models of symptom burden cluster risk in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting adverse prognostic outcomes in hospitalized breast cancer patients: development and validation of a risk model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Constructing an early warning model for elderly sepsis patients based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop models using different machine learning algorithms to predict high-risk symptom burden clusters in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, and to determine an optimal model.
methodsData from 647 breast cancer patients were analyzed to develop a model predicting high-risk symptom burden clusters. Five machine learning algorithms, including an artificial neural network (ANN), a decision tree (DT), a support vector machine (SVM), a random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were tested, as was traditional logistic regression. Performance was evaluated by deriving the predictive accuracy, precision, discriminatory capacity, calibration, and clinical utility, and an optimal model was identified.
resultsA model based on the RF algorithm exhibited better accuracy, precision, and discriminatory capacity than the other models. The area under the receiver operator curve was 0.91, the sensitivity was 65.8%, the specificity was 93.5%, the positive predictive value was 98.02%, and the false positive rate was only 0.91%.
conclusionThe model created using the RF algorithm was excellent in terms of predictive accuracy and precision, and can be used for early identification of the risk of self-reported symptom burden clusters in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.