ArticleEuropean radiology2025
RADEX: a rule-based clinical and radiology data extraction tool demonstrated on thyroid ultrasound reports.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of thyroid diseases: applications and challenges.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRadiology reports contain valuable information for research and audits, but relevant details are often buried within free-text fields. This makes them challenging and time-consuming to extract for secondary analyses, including training artificial intelligence (AI) models. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study presents a rule-based RAdiology Data EXtraction tool (RADEX) to enable biomedical researchers and healthcare professionals to automate information extraction from clinical documents. RADEX simplifies the translation of domain expertise into regular-expression models, enabling context-dependent searching without specialist expertise in Natural Language Processing. Its utility was demonstrated in the multi-label classification of fourteen clinical features in a large retrospective dataset (n = 16,246) of thyroid ultrasound reports from five hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK). A tuning subset (n = 200) was used to iteratively develop the search strategy, and a holdout test subset (n = 202) was used to evaluate the performance against reference-standard labels.
resultsThe dataset cardinality was 3.06, and the label density was 0.34. Cohen's Kappa was 0.94 for rater 1 and 0.95 for rater 2. For RADEX, micro-average sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.94, respectively. The processing time was 12.3 milliseconds per report, enabling fast and reliable information extraction.
conclusionRADEX is a versatile tool for bespoke research and audit applications, where access to labelled data or computing infrastructure is limited, or explainability and reproducibility are priorities. This offers a time-saving and freely available option to accelerate structured data collection, enabling new insights and improved patient care. KEY POINTS: Question Radiology reports contain vital information that is buried in unstructured free-text fields. Can we extract this information effectively for research and audit applications? Findings A rule-based RAdiology Data Extraction tool (RADEX) is described and used to classify fourteen key findings from thyroid ultrasound reports with sensitivity and specificity > 0.95. Clinical relevance RADEX offers clinicians and researchers a time-saving tool to accelerate structured data collection. This practical approach prioritises transparency, repeatability, and usability, enabling new insights into improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.