ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Update of the Amputation Registry Germany (AMP-Registry)].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mainzelliste: Ten years of pseudonymization, record linkage, and informed consent management.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- A national strategy for a canadian limb loss and limb difference registry.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2026Article
- The Changing Rates of Lower-Limb Amputations in Germany: An Analysis of Data from the Federal Statistical Office, 2005–2023.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical registries are used to collect valuable patient data in order to check and control the quality and effectiveness of treatment approaches. National registries in the field of amputation and patient care, such as the Swedish Amputation and Prosthetics Registry (SwedeAmp) and the Limb Loss and Preservation Registry (LLPR) in the USA, gather information on prosthetic devices, materials, procedures and patient-related outcomes such as mobility and quality of life. Since 2011 SwedeAmp could generate significant insights into long-term outcomes after amputations and improve prosthetic care in Sweden. In the USA the LLPR collects data on aspects ranging from clinical to psychosocial aspects, enabling international comparisons and the optimization of care. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn Germany the AMP Registry makes significant contributions by documenting data on prosthetic fit, wearing comfort and the reasons for revisions. The aim of the AMP Registry is to create an evidence base through systematic data collection. The project includes the development of a user-friendly IT structure, a pilot phase for application evaluation and close collaboration with experts. Standardized datasets aim to identify deficits in care and develop evidence-based approaches. Data collection and storage are carried out in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (DSGVO) and secured through technical measures. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Initial results from the Heidelberg Study Center demonstrate the potential of the AMP Registry. Subgroup analyses support optimization of care and highlight the importance of regular assessments to improve long-term care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.