Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39945532›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

Deciphering reductive dehalogenase specificity through targeted mutagenesis of chloroalkane reductases.

Katherine J Picott, Connor M Bowers, Elizabeth A Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revisiting the dihaloelimination potential ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine J PicottDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3525-2366
Connor M BowersDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-8689-3008
Elizabeth A EdwardsDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8071-338X

Funding

Canadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Canadian Graduate Scholarship - DoctoralCanadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant, Canada Research ChairCanadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Undergraduate Student Research AwardGovernment of Ontario (Ontario Government) Ontario Graduate Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reductive dehalogenases (RDases) are essential in the anaerobic degradation of various organohalide contaminants. This family of enzymes has broad sequence diversity, but high structural conservation. There have been few studies assessing how RDase amino acid sequences affect their substrate selectivity. Here, we focus on two chloroalkane RDases, CfrA and DcrA, which have 95% protein sequence identity but have diverged to have opposite substrate preferences. CfrA dechlorinates chloroform (CF) and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) but not 1,1-dichloroethane (DCA), while DcrA will dechlorinate 1,1-DCA but not CF or 1,1,1-TCA. We mutated several residues in the active site of CfrA to investigate a change in substrate preference and to identify which wild-type residues contribute the most to substrate specialization. We determined that no individual residue solely dictates substrate discrimination, but both Y80W and F125W mutations were needed to force CfrA to prefer 1,1-DCA as a substrate. When using 1,1,2-TCA as a substrate, CfrA predominately performs hydrogenolysis to 1,2-DCA, yet the introduction of the double mutant changed this preference to dihaloelimination (forming vinyl chloride). We use predictive protein models and substrate docking to predict what interactions are made between the enzyme and substrate to aid in selection. The residues of significance identified in this study are consistent with those identified from chloroethene RDases, suggesting residue locations with a particularly high impact on activity.IMPORTANCEReductive dehalogenases (RDases) play an integral role in the removal of chlorinated solvents from the environment. These enzymes have specificity toward different chlorinated compounds, and it is known that natural variants of highly similar RDases can have distinct activities. How specific differences in protein sequence influence activity is largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that mutating a few residues within the active site of CfrA-a chloroform and trichloroethane-specific dehalogenase-changes its substrate preference to dichloroethane. We determine that only two mutations are needed to disrupt the native activity, underscoring the nuances in substrate-structure relationships in RDases. Though we are still far from predicting function from the sequence, this knowledge can give some insight into engineering RDases for new target contaminants.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsHydrolasesOxidoreductasesCatalytic DomainChloroformMutagenesisSubstrate SpecificityTrichloroethanesBacterial ProteinsChloroformHydrolasesOxidoreductasesTrichloroethanesactive sitebioremediationchloroalkaneDehalobactermutagenesisreductive dehalogenasesubstrate specificity

Identifiers

PMID39945532
PMCPMC11921367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.