ArticleJournal of experimental botany2025
CORONATINE INSENSITIVE 1-mediated repression of immunity-related genes in Arabidopsis roots is lifted upon infection with Verticillium longisporum.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Candidate Hub Genes and Putative Pathways inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Verticillium longisporum is a soil-borne fungal pathogen that causes vascular disease predominantly in Brassicaceae. We have previously reported that the receptor of the plant defense hormone jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile), CORONATINE INSENSITIVE 1 (COI1), is required in roots for the fungus to proliferate efficiently in the shoot, suggesting the presence of a mobile root-borne signal that influences the outcome of the disease in shoots. This function of COI1 in promoting susceptibility is independent of JA-Ile. To explore the underlying mechanisms, in this study we compared the root transcriptome of the Arabidopsis coi1 mutant with those of the susceptible JA-Ile-deficient allene oxide synthase (aos) mutant and the susceptible wild-type (WT). The biggest difference between the transcriptomes was due to 316 immunity-related genes that were constitutively higher expressed in coi1 as compared to the susceptible genotypes. Interfering with the expression of a sub-group of these genes partially suppressed the coi1-mediated tolerance phenotype. We therefore hypothesize that secreted defense compounds encoded by genes constitutively expressed in coi1 are transported to the shoot with the transpiration stream where they accumulate and interfere with fungal growth. In addition, we found that 149 of the 316 COI1-repressed genes were induced in the WT and aos upon infection, reaching similar expression levels as in mock-treated coi1. These were not further induced in coi1 upon infection. Thus, the repressive effect of COI1 is either lifted or overridden upon infection with V. longisporum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.