ArticleCancer medicine2025
Multi-Institutional Analysis of Survival and Recurrence Patterns of Different Pathological Regression Types After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy or Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Is it Time for a Paradigm Shift?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Do we need to adapt the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system after neo-adjuvant treatment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity of adjuvant therapy effectiveness across post-neoadjuvant pathologic strata in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Article
- Pathological responses to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: implications for survival and recurrence in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe recurrence patterns of different types of pathologic regression of the primary tumor and lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) are little known, especially in ypT0N+ patients.
methodsWe included 582 patients with ESCC who had esophagectomy after NCRT or neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) from 3 institutions. The patients were divided into 4 groups: ypT0N0, ypT0N+, ypT+N0, and ypT+N+ according to the type of pathological regression of the primary tumor and lymph nodes. Survival, recurrence pattern and timing, and potential prognostic factors were compared.
resultsA total of 179 patients were classified as ypT0N0, 227 patients as ypT + N0, 45 patients as ypT0N+, and 131 patients as ypT + N+. The median follow-up was 31.7 months in all patients. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) of ypT0N0, ypT + N0, ypT0N+, and ypT + N+ patients decreased sequentially (70.64, 63.84, 55.93 and 39.96 months) and the recurrence rates increased sequentially (22.3%, 29.5%, 44.4% and 54.2%). Both the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the ypT0N+ group were significantly lower than those in the ypT0N0 group (HR: 2.226, p = 0.007; HR: 2.271, p = 0.003). The distant metastasis (DM) pattern in ypT0N+ was similar to that of ypT + N+, and higher than that of ypN0 (25.6% vs 14.3%, HR: 1.970, p = 0.040).
conclusionsESCC patients with various pathological regression types after receiving NCRT or NRT had significantly different survival rates. ypT0N+ patients had a lower survival rate and higher DM rate than ypT0N0 patients. For these lymph node-positive patients, adjuvant chemotherapy does not appear to improve their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.