ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2025
Fitness and Screen Time at Age 13 Relates to Academic Performance at Age 16.
Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When more is not always better: exercise dose and children's cognitive development from an interpretable machine learning perspective.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- From problematic screen use to stress: psychological quality and academic burnout among 10- and 13-year-olds children.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimInvestigate the longitudinal relationship between physical activity, organised physical activity, fitness, screen time and academic performance among Swedish adolescents.
methodsData from 1139 adolescents at age 13, included vigorous physical activity (accelerometry), fitness (submaximal ergometer test), screen time and organised physical activity participation (self-reported) and academic performance (math and Swedish grades at ages 13 and 16 from registry). Academic performance at age 16 was categorised as A-D (higher grades or pass) or E, F (fail or at-risk of failing). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine the relationships while adjusting for gender, parental education, parental country of birth and academic performance at age 13.
resultsHigher fitness at age 13 was associated with increased odds of receiving A-D at age 16 (OR: 1.04 per mL, 99% CI 1.00, 1.07, p = 0.003). High screen time during weekdays was associated with reduced odds (OR: 0.40, 99% CI 0.20, 0.81, p = 0.001) compared to low screen time.
conclusionAcademic performance at the end of compulsory school (age 16) was related to fitness and screen time 3 years earlier. These findings create a paradigm for future randomised controlled trials to explore how influencing these factors might affect academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.