Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39945204›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2025

A Veterinary DICOM-Based Deep Learning Denoising Algorithm Can Improve Subjective and Objective Brain MRI Image Quality.

Wilfried Mai, Silke Hecht, Matthew Paek, Shannon P Holmes, Hugo Dorez, Martin Blanchard, Jamil Nour Eddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wilfried MaiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-6079
Silke HechtDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8805-836X
Matthew PaekSynergy Veterinary Imaging Partners, MD/VA, Frederick, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5138-3802
Shannon P HolmesAXIS - Animal Cross-Sectional Imaging Specialists, Sarasota, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-5875
Hugo DorezHawkcell, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-721X
Martin BlanchardHawkcell, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9851-1491
Jamil Nour EddinHawkcell, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1635-7250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this analytical cross-sectional method comparison study, we evaluated brain MR images in 30 dogs and cats with and without using a DICOM-based deep-learning (DL) denoising algorithm developed specifically for veterinary patients. Quantitative comparison was performed by measuring signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) on the same T2-weighted (T2W), T2-FLAIR, and Gradient Echo (GRE) MR brain images in each patient (native images and after denoising) in identical regions of interest. Qualitative comparisons were then conducted: three experienced veterinary radiologists independently evaluated each patient's T2W, T2-FLAIR, and GRE image series. Native and denoised images were evaluated separately, with observers blinded to the type of images they were assessing. For each image type (native and denoised) and pulse sequence type image, they assigned a subjective grade of coarseness, contrast, and overall quality. For all image series tested (T2W, T2-FLAIR, and GRE), the SNRs of cortical gray matter, subcortical white matter, deep gray matter, and internal capsule were statistically significantly higher on images treated with DL denoising algorithm than native images. Similarly, for all image series types tested, the CNRs between cortical gray and white matter and between deep gray matter and internal capsule were significantly higher on DL algorithm-treated images than native images. The qualitative analysis confirmed these results, with generally better coarseness, contrast, and overall quality scores for the images treated with the DL denoising algorithm. In this study, this DICOM-based DL denoising algorithm reduced noise in 1.5T MRI canine and feline brain images, and radiologists' perceived image quality improved.

Indexed as

BrainCat DiseasesDeep LearningDog DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsAnimalsCatsCross-Sectional StudiesDogsFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleSignal-To-Noise Ratioartificial intelligencenoise reductionpostprocessing

Identifiers

PMID39945204
PMCPMC11822732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.