Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39945062›Full record

ReviewCirculation2025

Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology: An Update on Structure, Care Delivery, Training, and Research Paradigms: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Shashank S Sinha, Bram J Geller, Jason N Katz, Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren, Christopher F Barnett, Erin A Bohula, Abdulla A Damluji, Venu Menon, Robert O Roswell, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Tracing the evolution of cardiology: Pioneering discoveries and paradigm shifts in cardiovascular care.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Cardiogenic Shock and the Role of Critical Care Cardiology: Evidence, Models of Care, and Future Directions.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bram J Geller
Jason N Katz
Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren
Christopher F Barnett
Erin A Bohula
Abdulla A Damluji
Venu Menon
Robert O Roswell
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Amanda R Vest
Sean van Diepen
David A Morrow
American Heart Association Acute Cardiac Care and General Cardiology Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease

Funding

Frailty and Resiliency in Older Adults with Acute Myocardial InfarctionK23HL153771 · NHLBI · INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES · PI DAMLUJI, ABDULLA AL · 2020 to 2024
$916k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL153771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical care cardiology refers to the practice focus of and subspecialty training for the comprehensive management of life-threatening cardiovascular diseases and comorbid conditions that require advanced critical care in an intensive care unit. The development of coronary care units is often credited for a dramatic decline in mortality rates after acute myocardial infarction throughout the 1960s. As the underlying patient population became progressively sicker, changes in organizational structure, staffing, care delivery, and training paradigms lagged. The coronary care unit gradually evolved from a focus on rapid resuscitation from ventricular arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction into a comprehensive cardiac intensive care unit designed to care for the sickest patients with cardiovascular disease. Over the past decade, the cardiac intensive care unit has continued to transform with an aging population, increased clinical acuity, burgeoning cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities, technologic advances in cardiovascular interventions, and increased use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices. Herein, we provide an update and contemporary expert perspective on the organizational structure, staffing, and care delivery in the cardiac intensive care unit; examine the challenges and opportunities present in the education and training of the next generation of physicians for critical care cardiology; and explore quality improvement initiatives and scientific investigation, including multicenter registry initiatives and randomized clinical trials, that may change clinical practice, care delivery, and the research landscape in this rapidly evolving discipline.

Indexed as

American Heart AssociationCardiologyCritical CareDelivery of Health CareCoronary Care UnitsHumansUnited StatesAHA Scientific Statementscardiologyclinical competencecoronary care unitscritical careintensive care unitsquality of health care

Identifiers

PMID39945062
PMCPMC12063187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.