ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Variable Importance Measures Suggest Paramount Influence of Human Economics on Alien-Species Introductions.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the most important variables that determine patterns and processes is one of the main goals in many scientific fields, including ecological and evolutionary studies. Variable or relative importance is generally seen as the proportion of the variation in a response variable explained directly and indirectly by a specific predictor. Although partial regression coefficients are perhaps the most frequently used, 'standard', statistical technique in ecological and evolutionary studies, they are inadequate indices of variable importance when predictors are intercorrelated, which tends to be the rule in most observational data sets. Among other statistical techniques, random forests and hierarchical partitioning are designed to cope with collinearity but are still much less used than beta weights to measure variable importance. Here, we compared random forests and hierarchical partitioning with linear mixed models to attempt to unravel the individual and shared variation of environmental, economic, and human population factors with success of alien species richness in eight taxonomic groups at a global scale. Results showed that random forests and hierarchical partitioning generally agreed in ranking variable importance but showed considerably different conclusions to the standard statistical approach. Specifically, random forests and hierarchical partitioning attached more importance to economic and human population variables in explaining spatial patterns of alien species richness than did region area and mean air temperature, which were emphasized more by the standard approach. Beta weights also tended to highlight less correlated predictors, such as sampling effort and precipitation. Variable importance in random forests attached more importance to economic than population variables and to absolute rather than relative predictors. In conclusion, using variable importance measures enable to better identify the most significant drivers of biological invasions but it can also be applied to other biological and scientific questions, leading to tackle more efficient management and conservation decisions in global change research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.