Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944900›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental sciences Europe2025

Unmute biodiversity risks of free trade? The EFTA-Mercosur Agreement (Swiss) case study.

Rémi Willemin, Cornelia B Krug, Nicolas Roux, Elisabeth Bürgi Bonanomi, Marc Chesney, Benjamin Curnow, Sierra Deutsch, Maarten B Eppinga, Johanna Jacobi, Sofia J van Moorsel and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental sciences Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rémi WilleminDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Cornelia B KrugDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolas RouxInstitute of Social Ecology (SEC), Department of Economics and Social Sciences, BOKU University, Vienna, Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070 Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth Bürgi BonanomiCentre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Marc ChesneyCenter of Competence for Sustainability, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 32, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Benjamin CurnowBusiness School, Federation University, PO Box 663, Ballarat VIC 3353, Australia.
Sierra DeutschInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Maarten B EppingaDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Johanna JacobiInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Sofia J van MoorselDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Fanny PetibonDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Leila SchuhDepartment of Mathematics, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Gabi SondereggerCentre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Patrick O WaeberBern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
Maria J SantosDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainability and environmental impact assessments of trade and investment agreements need to address biodiversity more effectively. To showcase this, we examined a report, commissioned by Switzerland, on potential environmental impacts and risks of the trade between Switzerland and the Mercosur under the EFTA-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement. Our analysis focuses on chemical pollution, regulatory impact, duty-free precious minerals, deforestation, and greenhouse gas emission to develop a roadmap for (re-)interpreting (muted) risks on biodiversity in light of the Global Biodiversity Framework. Our analytical approach on normative and substantive effectiveness of impact assessments encourages broader responses to impacts of economic policies on biodiversity and ecosystems. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12302-025-01063-3.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDeforestationEnvironmental impact assessmentGoldIndigenous peoplesPesticidesSustainability impact assessmentTransdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID39944900
PMCPMC11811242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.