ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit: a meta-analysis and systematic review of outcomes for preterm infants.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging Parental Perceptions and Experiences of Family-Centered Care in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Fighting for Life: Five Advances in Neonatal Surgery Over 50 Years.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Parental satisfaction with neonatal care in tertiary hospitals in Nigeria: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Digital Competencies for Pediatric Nurse Leaders to Sustain Patient- and Family-Centered Care: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Implementation of Family Integrated Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Sussex, UK.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Music-based research in neonatal intensive care units requires guidelines grounded in developmental neurology and responsive to the individual needs of preterm infants.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Risk factors for BPD and relevant nursing models of care to improve outcomes: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Indicators of physical and emotional health in infants during hospitalization in paediatric cardiac intensive care units.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Content Validity, Feasibility, and Acceptability of the Neurosense PremmieEd Programme, a South African Premature Parenting Education Intervention for the NICU Parent: A Hybrid Focus Group Discussion Method.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring Chinese family caregiver vigilance in preventing hospitalized children falls from the attention network theory perspective: a qualitative study.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of family integrated care for preterm infants is not well established. This meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of family-integrated care on preterm infants to inform neonatal clinical practices. Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu, and Wanfang databases up to August 25, 2024. Two researchers independently screened articles, applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and performed quality assessments and data extraction. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, encompassing 3,005 preterm infants, of which 1,390 received family-integrated care. Family-integrated care significantly improved breastfeeding rates [odds ratio (OR) =5.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37 to 14.82, P<0.001], weight gain [mean difference (MD) =3.16, 95% CI: 2.51 to 3.80, P<0.001], and sleep duration (MD =3.25, 95% CI: 2.05 to 4.44, P<0.001) in preterm infants and reduced the one-month readmission rate (OR =0.37, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.61, P<0.001). Egger's regression test indicated no publication bias among the outcomes (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Family-integrated care markedly improves breastfeeding rates, promotes weight gain, and extends sleep duration in preterm infants, while concurrently reducing the likelihood of hospital readmission. This approach offers substantial benefits to both the preterm infants and their families, highlighting its potential for wider implementation in neonatal nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.