ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Risk factors and risk prediction model for recurrence in medulloblastoma.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal integration of pathomics and clinical features improves recurrence risk prediction in pediatric medulloblastoma.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- The predictive value of pre-treatment MRI-based radiomics and clinical characteristics for medulloblastoma recurrence in pediatric patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: At present, there is a lack of established treatment protocols for recurrent medulloblastoma. The assessment of recurrence risk prior to treatment is of utmost importance in determining the most suitable treatment modality and intensity for medulloblastoma. Consequently, the creation of a predictive model for medulloblastoma recurrence is imperative in aiding clinical decision-making. The objective of this study is to construct an enhanced risk prediction model for relapse in medulloblastoma by integrating molecular subtyping and straightforward immune markers, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), into a nomogram. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 273 patients diagnosed with medulloblastoma. The NLR was calculated prior to radiotherapy, and various clinical characteristics including age, gender, molecular subtype, dissemination, and residual lesions after resection were collected. Survival analysis was performed utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method, while Cox regression models were employed to identify independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, a column chart illustrating all independent prognostic factors was generated using R. The nomogram's prognostic predictive ability was evaluated using the Concordance Index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), and calibration curve. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was determined to be 63.8 months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors that were associated with PFS in patients diagnosed with medulloblastoma. These factors included age, residual tumor volume exceeding 1.5 cm Conclusions: Our study revealed that the NLR prior to treatment serves as an autonomous prognostic determinant for the recurrence or metastasis of medulloblastoma subsequent to treatment. By integrating NLR with clinical variables, the utilization of a nomogram demonstrates the capability to anticipate PFS following radiotherapy in medulloblastoma patients. This nomogram exhibits potential in facilitating more accurate risk stratification, thereby guiding the implementation of personalized treatment strategies for individuals with medulloblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.