ReviewJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2025
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in sedation dentistry: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remimazolam tosilate combined with remifentanil hydrochloride alleviates dental phobia in patients undergoing tooth extraction surgeries.Odontology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of Remimazolam besylate for intravenous sedation in dental procedures for patients with cognitive disabilities: a prospective single-arm observational study.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Nationwide trends in intravenous sedative and analgesic drug use in Korean dental institutions: a big data analysis using the Narcotics Information Management System from 2020 to 2024.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Article
- Is remimazolam a suitable alternative to midazolam for dental sedation?Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Anesthetic Features in Diazepam and Midazolam for Sedation Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Pharmacologic Sedation-Related Respiratory Complications in Pediatric Dentistry: A Decade-Long Scoping Review.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to evaluate the safety of remimazolam for intravenous sedation during dental treatment and oral surgery. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RFPSZ), and reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Literature searches and screenings were conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane database, with additional records manually reviewed from various sources. The selected studies, published in English, investigated the safety of remimazolam for sedation in dental and oral surgery. An initial search identified 20 studies, of which five prospective studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies used an initial bolus administration of remimazolam. Primary outcomes assessed were the sedation success rate, incidence of adverse effects, onset time, awakening time, recovery time, and postoperative side effects. This scoping review indicates that all studies validated the superiority of remimazolam over other sedatives for dental treatment and oral surgery. The development and research of innovative technologies to reduce dental pain and anxiety presents opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and improved patient care in dental practice. Future clinical studies should focus on determining the optimal timing for additional dosing and discontinuation when remimazolam is administered continuously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.