Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944770›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Arthroscopic Anchor Placement During Shoulder Anterior Labral Repair in the Beach-Chair Versus the Lateral Decubitus Position: An Imaging Analysis.

Steven D Jones, Alex Lencioni, Bryant P Elrick, Todd Baldini, Jonathan T Bravman, Eric C McCarty, Adam Seidl, Rachel M Frank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evidence-Based Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Labral Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven D JonesDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, North Oaks Orthopedic Specialty Center-Hammond, Hammond, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-9120
Alex LencioniDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Reno Orthopedic Center, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Bryant P ElrickDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colordao, USA.
Todd BaldiniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colordao, USA.
Jonathan T BravmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colordao, USA.
Eric C McCartyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colordao, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8948-5862
Adam SeidlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colordao, USA.
Rachel M FrankDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colordao, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic shoulder capsuloligamentous repair can be performed in the beach-chair (BC) or lateral decubitus (LD) position. Patient positioning may influence anchor placement. Limited research exists evaluating these 2 positioning techniques, specifically with respect to anchor position and trajectory. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to perform a cadaveric imaging analysis of arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization in the LD and BC positions. It was hypothesized that repairs performed in the LD position would demonstrate more accurate anterior inferior anchor positioning. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nine matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders (18 total shoulders) were used. Specimens underwent arthroscopic anterior inferior labral repair using 3 suture anchors placed in the 3:30, 4:30, and 5:30 positions. Repairs were performed by 2 fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons each trained in a respective technique. Specimens then underwent computed tomography analysis to evaluate anchor position and trajectories. Target anchor location was determined using a 3-dimensional computed tomography glenoid model, using ImageJ software, with the clockface overlaid onto the glenoid. The 3-o'clock position was set at 0° for reference, with the 3:30, 4:30, and 5:30 anchor positions set at -15°, -45°, and -75°, respectively. One-tailed Results: Inferior anchor (5:30) placement was found to be more accurate in the LD position, while superior anchor (3:30) placement was found to be more accurate in the BC position. Specifically, the LD group did not demonstrate statistically significant deviation from the target ideal (-75°) for the 5:30 anchor. The true deviance for the LD group from the 5:30 target angle was between -78.6° and -58.5° ( Conclusion: Both positioning techniques remain safe and efficacious. The LD position may offer improved inferior anchor placement, and the BC position may offer improved superior anchor placement. Additional studies are warranted to further elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of each position. Clinical Relevance: Knowledge pertaining to the accuracy of anchor placement based on patient positioning and anchor location may aid surgeons in choosing operating positions to potentially optimize anchor placement during arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization surgery.

Indexed as

anchor placementanterior shoulder instabilitybeach chairlateral decubituspatient positioningshoulder arthroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39944770
PMCPMC11815946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.