ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2025
Further Defining Optimal Pharmacist-to-Patient Ratios to Ensure Comprehensive Direct Patient Care in Medical and Surgical Units across British Columbia Hospitals.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient care ratios for pharmacists are not well defined in Canada. A recent work-sampling study involving 6 medium and large hospitals within the region served by Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, British Columbia, reported pharmacist-to-patient ratios of 1:13, 1:26, and 1:14 in internal medicine teaching units, hospitalist or internal medicine nonteaching units, and surgical units, respectively. Objective: To determine the pharmacist-to-patient ratios required to provide comprehensive pharmaceutical care to adult patients admitted to medical and surgical units in medium and large hospitals in British Columbia. Methods: In this cross-sectional electronic survey study, participants were asked to provide estimates of the time spent on and the frequency of 17 comprehensive pharmaceutical care tasks identified in the previous study, which was based on a Delphi method. The survey data were used to calculate pharmacy staffing ratios according to the World Health Organization workforce calculator. Results: Fifty-eight pharmacists responded to the survey, of whom 41 (71%) were from medium and large hospitals. The optimal pharmacist-to-patient ratios were calculated as 1:7 for internal medicine teaching units; 1:10 for internal medicine nonteaching, hospitalist, and family practice units; and 1:14 for surgical units. Conclusions: The pharmacist-to-patient ratios calculated in this study, using only pharmacists' self-reported information, were lower than those found previously. Further research is required to determine whether completion of every comprehensive care task is necessary, or if staffing ratios should reflect combinations of comprehensive care tasks based on patient complexity. National consensus guidelines on pharmacist staffing ratios may be valuable, given the current lack of standardization of pharmacy staffing ratios in hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.