Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944727›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Post-craniotomy infections: A point-by-point approach.

Giovanni Carone, Marta Bonada, Evelyn Gisell Belotti, Eugenia D'Angeli, Annica Piccardi, Fabio Martino Doniselli, Guido Gubertini, Cecilia Casali, Francesco DiMeco, Massimiliano Del Bene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giovanni CaroneDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Marta BonadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Evelyn Gisell BelottiDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Eugenia D'AngeliDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Annica PiccardiDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Fabio Martino DoniselliNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Guido GubertiniInfectious Disease Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Cecilia CasaliDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Francesco DiMecoDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Massimiliano Del BeneDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Post-craniotomy neurosurgical infections (PCNIs) significantly challenge daily neurosurgical practice, affecting patient outcomes and imposing economic burdens on healthcare systems. Despite advances in surgical techniques and infection control protocols, PCNIs still contribute to surgical-related morbidity and mortality. Research question: To address these unresolved questions through a comprehensive literature review. Material and methods: We conducted a detailed literature review using the keywords "Infection, Craniotomy, Neurosurgery," on PubMed, which yielded 2330 articles. Out of these, 171 were selected, based on relevance, and rigorously reviewed. The review aimed to answer thirteen major questions stemming from the management of PCNIs. Results: PCNI incidences range from 0.7% to 8%, predominantly caused by gram-positive bacteria, especially Staphylococcus species. Significant risk factors identified include CSF leakage, emergency surgery, and certain tumour types, with infections typically manifesting post-discharge. Diagnostic approaches integrate clinical, radiological, and laboratory assessments, with advances in molecular diagnostics showing promising precision. While antibiotic prophylaxis remains effective, emerging resistance warrants cautious application. Surgical intervention is often indispensable for managing organ-space infections, with a trend towards bone flap preservation and one-step cranioplasty procedures in certain cases. Discussion and conclusion: The management of PCNIs remains a major challenge. There is a critical need for standardization of definitions and data reporting. Advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies may bring future improvements in clinical outcomes, despite antibiotic resistance phenomena and the complexity of surgical decisions required. Ultimately, major engagement is aimed at refining and updating clinical protocols to improve and standardize the management of PCNIs.

Indexed as

CraniotomyNeurosurgeryPost-craniotomy infectionProphylactic antibioticSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID39944727
PMCPMC11814530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.