Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944669›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2025

Future protein alternative: recent progress and challenges in cellular agriculture.

Da Hyeon Yang, Ki-Sung Kook, Youngmin Heo, Woo-Ju Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Da Hyeon YangDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, 01811 Republic of Korea.
Ki-Sung KookDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, 01811 Republic of Korea.
Youngmin HeoDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, 01811 Republic of Korea.
Woo-Ju KimDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, 01811 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6954-1580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With arising concerns regarding traditional livestock-based proteins, cultivated meat is emerging as a potential alternative. Cultivated meat, often called cultured meat, is defined as a meat produced in the lab by growing animal-derived cells. Considering the cultivated meat is based on animal-origin, it may present several advantages over other types of meat analogue in terms of flavor and nutritional properties. To be commercially available, there are several technical limitations to overcome. This indicates the necessity to integrate information to comprehensively review the current progress. In this review, history and background about the development of cultivated meat is described. Also, the recent progress in cell culture media and scaffold, which are essential components to grow animal cells, is presented. Next, the aspects regarding antibiotics to minimize the risk of bacterial contamination is discussed. Finally, the consumer perception and governmental regulations concerning the consumption and production of cultivated meat are addressed.

Indexed as

Alternative meatAlternative proteinCellular agricultureCultivated meatFoodTechFuture food

Identifiers

PMID39944669
PMCPMC11811358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.