ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Application of three-dimensional printing in the planning and execution of aortic aneurysm repair.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional nanoparticles in abdominal aortic aneurysm management: from basic research to clinical transformation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Rethinking Access in BEVAR: Single-Center Experience of the Feasibility of Upward-Facing Branches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- 3D printing-assisted triple-vesselFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional simulations for planning fenestrated/branched endografts in endovascular aneurysm repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm: a retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The accuracy of fenestrations in stent grafts for complex aortic aneurysms and dissections can be significantly improved using three-dimensional (3D)-printed phantoms. Standardization is enhanced by using artificial intelligence (AI) for image pre-processing before 3D printing. These methods address fallacies in centerline image analysis and manual image pre-processing. This review examines the application of 3D printing and AI in complex aortic aneurysm repair, highlighting current clinical trends. Methods: An exhaustive literature review was performed using keywords such as "3D printing," "Artificial intelligence," "Thoracoabdominal aneurysm," "Abdominal aortic aneurysm," "Aortic arch aneurysm," "Endovascular repair," and "Open repair" in PubMed and Google Scholar indexes up to June 2022. Results: This analysis included seven studies: four focused on 3D-printed phantoms for endovascular repair of various aortic pathologies (aortic arch, thoracoabdominal aorta, juxtarenal and pararenal aorta), one on open thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using 3D-printed models for graft construction, and two on the use of convolutional neural networks, an AI-based technology, for the pre-processing of aortic computed tomography angiography images. Conclusion: The application of 3D printing and AI-based image pre-processing in the planning of complex aortic aneurysms offers several benefits, including enhanced patient and trainee education, more accurate fenestration placement, reduced surgical time and complications, and decreased surgeon stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.