ArticleDementia and neurocognitive disorders2025
Tracking Cognitive Trajectories in Mild Cognitive Impairment Using a Machine Learning Technique of Subtype and Stage Inference.
Article in Dementia and neurocognitive disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Recognizing cognitive decline patterns in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial for early screening and preventive interventions. However, studies on the trajectory of individual cognitive functions in MCI are limited. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify subtypes and stages of cognitive decline in MCI using a machine learning method. Methods: A total of 944 subjects consisting of those who were cognitively normal and those with MCI were enrolled. Fifteen neuropsychological tasks were used in the analysis. The optimal number of subtypes was determined based on the cross-validation information criterion. Fifteen stages of cognitive trajectory were estimated for each subtype. Results: The following three subtypes were identified: amnestic-verbal subtype, dysexecutive subtype, and amnestic-visual subtype. Of 723 (76.6%) subjects who had reached stage 1 at least, amnestic-verbal subtype accounted for the most (n=340, 47.0%), followed by dysexecutive subtype (n=253, 35.0%) and amnestic-visual subtype (n=130, 18%). The amnestic-verbal subtype had significantly more males (amnestic-verbal: 41.8%, dysexecutive: 31.2%, and amnestic-visual: 28.5%), younger subjects (amnestic-verbal: 72.01 years, dysexecutive: 74.43 years, and amnestic-visual: 75.06 years), higher educational years (amnestic-verbal: 11.06 years, dysexecutive: 9.53 years, and amnestic-visual: 9.79 years), lower Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (amnestic-verbal: 1.40, dysexecutive: 1.61, and amnestic-visual: 1.71), and lower Korean-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living score (amnestic-verbal: 0.20, dysexecutive: 0.27, and amnestic-visual: 0.26). Conclusions: Three types of MCIs were extracted using SuStaIn. Pathways of MCI deterioration could be different. The amnestic type could be bisected based on whether episodic verbal or visual memory is degraded first.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.